Adult sex on the Annapolis Maryland Adult sex on the Annapolis Maryland Register Login Contact Us

Hung Rock Springs guy needs a blow job


Hung Rock Springs guy needs a blow job

Online: Now

About

Send picture with reply, please.

Cariotta
Age:42
Relationship Status:Newlyweds
Seeking:Wanting Man
City:Provo
Hair:Sexy
Relation Type:Seeking A Sweet Girl Of Asian Decent

Hung Rock Springs guy needs a blow job

Doubt This Works But Gaithersburg Maryland A Shot

Discrete Cougars Milfs Hotwifes and Soccer Moms married man here tired of what my sex life has become. Sub male wanting a strong woman m4w I am a hwp dd free male wanting to try being submissive.

If so, I'm sorry that I keep messing up meeting you; I want to so very badly, despite how it may seem. MY BIRTHDAY. I have a career that I like, an ex that I get along with, and no children. Get drunk and fuck in star m4w Looking for a cute girl around my age to get drunk with and fuck, I'm a husky guy and tall at 5'10 and my birthday is wednesdayPics on requestIts real damn hot today I am a 6'4 puerto rican black black mixed male 21 years old with an athletic build. I am a married man who is waiting for a woman who may also be married. Submissive agrees to boobsemble the punishment materials as ordered by Mistress and boobsume any reasonable position needed to accept the punishment, subject to the use of the safeword or safesign.

This menu's updates are based on your activity. The data is only saved locally on your computer and never transferred to us. You can click these links to clear your history or disable it. Double and Triple penetration.

Nastya wants her boyfriend's cock in her tight ass! Sabrina Sabrok bien cogida por el culo y tragando leche. RealGfsExposed - Milla get the hots for her stepdad hard cock. His dick taste so good part 3 Cum action. Haighlee makes him cum using strapon. Lusty MILF sucks dude before he eats her pussy.

Tinder Girl Loves Sucking Dick. Canadian Milf Linda loves a good tonguing. Long legs brunette walks on a beach in one-piece bikini.

Watch this hottie get off in fuck on Tinder - see what happens next at Goldstandardcams. Kissing passionately and touching our fit bodies. Chat rooms online - livesexik. Teen with unshaved pussy gets a nice Cumshot. My wife's a fountain. Petite girl hot dance.

Blonde scandi teens first anal sex. AJ Applegate - Gloryhole. Baby momma Blowjob HD. Double and Triple penetration 5 min - , hits. Samispank Fuck-my-ass-and-make-me-cum 10 min - 13, hits - p. Sabrina Sabrok bien cogida por el culo y tragando leche 32 min - 1,, hits - p. RealGfsExposed - Milla get the hots for her stepdad hard cock 11 min - 1,, hits - p. His dick taste so good part 3 Cum action 50 sec - 88, hits.

Haighlee makes him cum using strapon 11 min - , hits - p. Fuck sister morning 22 min - 9, hits - p. Lusty MILF sucks dude before he eats her pussy 31 min - 4, hits - p. Tinder Girl Loves Sucking Dick 10 min - hits - p. Canadian Milf Linda loves a good tonguing 36 sec - 39, hits. Rina Manning 20 min - , hits - p. Long legs brunette walks on a beach in one-piece bikini 14 min - 7, hits - p. Boob play 59 sec - 2, hits - p. WMV 7 min - 19, hits. Kissing passionately and touching our fit bodies 7 min - hits - p.

Teen with unshaved pussy gets a nice Cumshot 2 min - 1,, hits - p. My wife's a fountain 1 min 28 sec - 7, hits - p. Petite girl hot dance 2 min - 71, hits. Yummy 45 sec - 12, hits - p. Blonde scandi teens first anal sex 9 min - 53, hits. Cam girl masturbates 13 min - 1, hits - p. AJ Applegate - Gloryhole 8 min - 2,, hits - p.

Baby momma Blowjob HD 9 min - 15, hits - p.

Shadowlands Haunted Places Index - Illinois

His dick taste so good part 3 Cum action. Haighlee makes him cum using strapon. Lusty MILF sucks dude before he eats her pussy. Tinder Girl Loves Sucking Dick. Canadian Milf Linda loves a good tonguing. Long legs brunette walks on a beach in one-piece bikini. Watch this hottie get off in fuck on Tinder - see what happens next at Goldstandardcams. Kissing passionately and touching our fit bodies.

Chat rooms online - livesexik. Teen with unshaved pussy gets a nice Cumshot. My wife's a fountain. Petite girl hot dance. Blonde scandi teens first anal sex. AJ Applegate - Gloryhole. Baby momma Blowjob HD. I thought of less take step back, and be friends only, I did tried to or still we both try that, but for me its quite tough, as I know my heart still goes for him. I really wanna end all these confusion and get out of this. Either we both should be together or I completly move on from him and just be friend with him.

After mom, I rarely have friends left, not even I consider any relatives as my family, only one bro who is not well. In short I am alone, and this guy is the one I respect and adore the most. But sometimes, I just hate him for putting me on hold. I feel like this is tricking the guy into being with you. Why does getting a guy to like you so complicated? And as far as market value goes… how is that complicated? Probably one of the best articles into the male psyche I have ever read. Best compliment I can bestow.

Thank you for the logic. Hi Eric, My bf and I lived together for 6 years during which time his drinking and crazy behavior escalated. He moved out 3 years ago. He wanted to come back but I needed time to heal. By the time I healed he had lost feelings for me. For the following 6 months leading up to now, I acted like a nut.

Mostly his FB posts made me crazy and the female friends he was making. I still wanted to work it out and so I off and on depending on different things and behaviors acted very badly. We hooked up a few times off and on and he was still interested in doing that. I wonder if I caused that to happen. Now I am just backing off completely. He told me throughout and after our relationship that I was what he had always wished for. Do you see any way towards a future for us?

We really did love each other and had a really great relationship outside the stuff I mentioned before. And, I was the best I had ever been in a relationship.

We had love, respect, trust. Hard to believe now at the 10 year mark we are likely to never be together again. What can you tell me? Any chance he will remember me the way he knew me to be before and want it again? Thanks so much for responding. Excellent, honest, empowering and doable advice.

I have a question, if you can get to it. Im crazy about a guy but on our 2nd and last date, I was just acting weird—cold and distant, trying to not let him see how much I liked him. Is there anything I can do now to fix this or undo it? I want to tell him I was not myself that night and ask him to give me another chance.

Is this a good idea, or is it too much me pursuing him? Then, you second-guess yourself and think you screwed it up. If you trace it back, do you see this cycle underneath how things played out for you? Do you see it as how your actions came about and why you acted the way that you did?

You want them, so you fantasize about how great it would be to have them. Then you grow attached to that fantasy… and then you fear that the bubble will be burst in reality, so you make some move because of your fear. It is a natural unfolding of connection that comes as a byproduct of your enjoyment of each other.

It would be so great to have this friend! Oh no, what do I do?! It all comes down to this: Are you able to be OK right now… as you are… where you are… how you are? Can you be OK where you are at this moment? Or… will you be like the majority of the people in our society… who feel like they need something outside of themselves to be OK?

To have a baby? To buy a house? To get a cool car? I really love this response. Over and over again I meet guys who i really like. I create a fantasy of our perfect life together and as soon as I get excited about them, they stop calling. Then I freak out and go over every detail of the date wonder what little thing I did that made them go from being really into me, to not texting me.

Ok, so I understand that the problem is that I have this fantasy and I really like the guy. I have hobbies and a social life, but I would still really love a boyfriend.

Wow, this is me! My question is where can I find more literature on this topic? The part about the maintaining in an overall inner peaceable state, is a useful observation of human-to-human interaction. Thanks for honest relationship advice. You are clearly a smart man!: Love what you said about market value.

Learning your worth and value is so important. This is so helpful to see the impact of this. Hello Eric, Thank you for all of your relationship advice.

I have someone that loves, respects, and is always there for me. This article convinced me to live in the moment and enjoy every minute of it. Hi Eric Im from Iran, I read your websites and articles by accident.

But it was a great accident. At the same time My boy friend broke up with me and I could concure with my feeling with reading your articles. I also suggest your articles to my friends and every one i knew. I want to Thank you for opening my eyes to a new world. Ive had two bad relationships, and honestly want something really casual with this guy from work I think is cute.

Im also about to move cross country, and dont want a long distance relatiohip. I asked a guy friend to do some asking for me, and my friend said my crush reacted surprised but happy when my friend told him I liked him. He said sure, yes, pulled out his phone and I just handed him my cell number. Im very new to all this, so what should I do? Ill see him at work tomorrow and dont want it to be awkward. In that scenario, is it okay to tell him I dont feel comfortable doing anything behind kissing right now?

My past two relationships abused me in this area, and I dont want to scare him off with messiness or by being too prudish. I have a question. You mention that women should not neglect to wear make-up to help themselves look their best.

But I do want to look attractive for a man. Can you offer guidance on what style of make-up most normal men find attractive? Bright red lipstick vs more subdued tones? The best evidence for what men find most attractive is found in looking in places that have an exclusively male audience. In this day and age, I would not look at mainstream media at all for guidance in what men find attractive.

I would have the same advice for men, by the way…. So start there and I think you will be amazed at how different you find what men want versus what women-oriented media tells you. They have no political agenda they want to indoctrinate you with. With regards to androgeny… and this is not a political or social statement… it is biologically sexually repellant to look non-female. If you want to attract men, emphasize your woman-ness. If you like the androgynous look and you want it for yourself, more power to you.

In fact, there are some guy friends of mine that love women with the androgynous look. Just like there are some guys I know that love a woman with tattoos or any other presentation you can imagine. And, again, I have to emphasize you should focus on the NICHE of men you want to attract — pro-Athletes on average tend to like one type of woman… nerdy punk rock rebel type guys tend to prefer another… musicians tend to prefer another… and so on, so forth.

I can only tell you the best place to look — one free of corporate motivations and political-agendas. Hope it helps and good luck! Thanks a lot Eric. This article has really enlightened me now I know what my man wants. Thanks for the comment. Thank you for all the info. You really know your stuff. I worked with him for 3 months before any of this happened.

And then I saw a huge smile come on his face. Our eyes meet then his eyes go straight down to my chest then a little lower and then he tilts his head and goes back up to my chest then breaks contact. What is that saying about this situation? What was he trying to tell me?

What do u think? Lol oh and he used to talk about his wife always nagging and would tell his buddies that he very rarely has sex with her. Just some more info for you! I broke up with my ex 3 months ago. I found out he was cheating on me with a girl his been dating for 3 years.

After we broke up he went on a date with her to celebrate their 3 year anniversary but he told me they were celebrating 3 years of friendship which i do not believe. We started talking after our break up. I asked him if he still dating that girl he refused. I asked him back he refused because he wants to concentrate on his career and he says we might get back in future 3years from now.

I asked him if he really loved me and had feelings for me while we dated he said yes. Since then we have been talking. I told him i want to get over him but I have failed to do so because he always comes back into life such as him sending 25 pictures of himself. I told him I found a rebound to get over him his response was ok. I sent him a message telling him I would have appreciated if you picked up my calls or told me me you would not come, the journey between us ends today.

Did i do anything wrong? Does he still love me? Does he want space? Does he still love his girlfriend who he calls the ex? My ex won me over my previous boyfriend. Lies turn me off but everytime he lied to me i did not get turned off.

On 2 occasions he compared me to his ex just because she is intelligent and studying medicine and i am studying law and i keep repeating courses. He even went to on to say i am threatened by her which is not true. I want to know why he has not responded to any of my calls and messages even though he has seen them?

And is he worth it? I love him because of his personality. We both have a sense of humour. We always make each other laugh. He carries himself in a respectful and responsible manner. He acts mature, but after all this I have gone through i am doubting if he is mature at all. At that time i did not think he was cheating and i did not want any reassurance all I wanted was for me to talk to him just for my entertainment.

Eric, a lot of this is true. Men are quite visual — they care about a pretty face and body over your income. They care about a warm smile and a soft tone over your job title or where you went to college. Unfortunately, a lot of confident, successful women find this to be a tricky balance. How can we over-succeed a man without emasculating him?

Most of what you said is support-driven. Especially the successful ones. I wish there was a better answer for the more nuanced city-style relationship. This is the crap that gets babbled about in magazines. Even still, it would be your best strategy to find a guy who will line up with what you want….

If he were to break up with me tomorrow and we were no longer dating and never would ever again, would I still like this person on a human level? Would I still find him interesting? Would I still find him good? Would I still want to be friends with him? Relationships are really simple and reveal themselves in plain view.

Always has been, always will be. BUT the more picky you are with the relationship style you want, the more picky you need to be about WHO you select… select well and everything is easy and effortless by effortless I mean that even the parts of the relationship that take work never feel like work… the whole spectrum of the relationship is joyful in its own ways, even the challenging parts ….

How am I going to go get it? I really love your articles. They are truly helpful and I love your way of talking about men and women without making silly generalizations… Thank you also for taking the time to write these. Two weeks ago he came to my place for dinner. He asked me if I had a boyfriend and then I asked him if he did.

Would you have any advice for me? What should I do? Thank you so much. Eric, I found myself searching for the million dollar question we all want to know. Now Eric, I must tell you. I am a 44 year old woman. And have been married twice. And divorced both times. My last hitting its 16 year mark that I have been single. Now I have had relationships here and there.

I really do hate the whole dating game. I feel I know nothing more than I did when I was 16 about men. I actually found it very insightful. And I look forward to writting you back to let you know what happens. On the trip we really got to know each other, flirted and joked a little and since I was the only single girl there, he definitely paid extra attention to me by hiding my items or sitting on me or deliberately ripping me off and getting a reaction out of me.

Once we went home we talked for two weeks straight and then things started to dwindle. But eventually he wanted photos from me. Then when we went to another event together he picked up where we left off, sat next to me and only spoke to me. What does this mean? Am I wasting my time or am I making a mountain out of a molehill?

First off — how long have you been going out? Less than a year and maybe even 2 years and I doubt you are on the same page. How old are you two? If you are pretty young it is rare in this day and age to get married. Eric, keep up the great work. Somewhere along the way, we made relationships difficult and confusing. Being open to it, loving ourselves and accepting it. Thank you for making a difference.

One thing about superficial aspects: So trying to get over him. He thought I thought he was a toy.. I just recently met a man online and I ended up sleeping with him on the first date. I really like this guy and I think there may be potential for us to mesh well. Thank you for your insight,a mans point of view is extremely helpful. Ive dated a man for 9 months,he is very good to me.

He was married for 30 years,so dating is foreign to him it seems. However I was with him over a 4 day and night period,in which there was effort put forth by me sexually but hardly any by him towards me,totally different than usual.

Ive brought it out in conversation and we get interrupted phone calls and its not brought up by me or him. Thanks for your time T. If not, I cannot lose. For women who think they can just show up without working out or dressing well etc.

A good man deserves to feel good about his choices, just like women do. Nobody deserves the misery that comes from that situation. We should have just stayed friends.

Instead we drove each other crazy for years. Thanks so much Erik, for being a voice of reason in the sea of silly pandering. Your partner in crime has excellent advice, too! If I can offer some constructive criticism, though, that goofy movie has to go. I will leave a comment.

I want a partner to go through life with. I want a friend, partner, and lover. It may be asking too much. Ultimately, my approach and opinion have remained the same: I want to help people by telling them what works and what is effective.

In that way, there were certain concepts that people would ask about or talk about that are not as discussed nowadays. Six years ago, people were frequently asking me to talk about the concept of neediness. If it were up to me, though, I never would have ventured to talk about neediness since a lot of what I talk about precludes neediness from being an issue if you approach a relationship effectively.

Make your mood your top priority — live in a happy way. When you make your mood your priority and you allow happiness to be your guide, it becomes really easy to naturally and effortlessly attract love into your life.

When I find myself unhappy about something, I have taken your advice and looked inward. Then I choose happy and have actually been told I am fun by the person with whom I thought I was having an issue. Everything you have said is the truth, but you left out the MOST important thing especially after having thrived for 20 years with a high market-value woman: Attitude is the underlying foundation for everything you have stated Eric, and when it comes down to it, [ladies] attitude informs and influences everything a man is drawing upon to approach, win, love and keep a woman.

Conversely, a man who is drawn to a bad attitude has a mental instability — like immaturity or a sociopathy… I mean, really, who seeks out drama like that?!? I need to know do I give him space or continue to chat? My boyfriend has so much interest in me but i get too emotional and it dos put him off.

Thanks for your advice.. Does he loves me truly?? Thank you for your really good and insightful articles. I am a widow, aged He left his life behind, half a world away, to be with me. Then he left me after 6 months. Then 5 weeks later came back to me. Then after 4 weeks, he left me again. The reason he wanted me was because he knows that I am a winner and he has always felt like a loser in life. I inspired him to be the best man he ever could be and beyond … He loved the way I understood his goals, aspirations and dreams.

The way I supported and encouraged him. The way I was his biggest cheerleader! So, why did he run away? I really enjoy your columns. I find them eye-opening and straight to the point. Your frankness is priceless. Today, I am feeling so tired. I have been reading all the help tips about relationships and I still feel like a woman of convenience. We work together and he works 2 jobs, has no time and is exhausted all the time, so I am so tired of doing all the work. Our relationship has died down and while I am trying to be supportive and encourage him, I am beat.

I am a very upbeat gal and have lots of friends; however, I am a giver and I think that is hurting me. I am trying to hold back from that, but it is hard for me and I do it without thinking. He is very handsome and women are always throwing themselves at him. I think I have given up at this point. I am tired of the cancellations and promises that he does not keep. I get my hopes up and then they come crashing down. I stay busy and do other things but I am disappointed.

I am so sorry to be so negative, it is nothing to do with your advice, I think your advice is wonderful. I am tired of being the one that has to do all the work. I know he likes me, but maybe that is what it is, he likes me and that is the furthest it is going to go. I have been so upbeat through this whole thing, and now, I am beaten down. It is too much work!

This is a really good article, so technically what your saying is a woman should really learn how to belive in herself be happy with her life and love herself a men will be interested in that and want to be with her because she can help him grow she inspires him to do better …. So this is why I say making your mood the primary focus of your life is so important for relationships: Conversely, if your mood is great, it will shine through all of your other great qualities and you will shine brightly and attract love from every angle.

Eric- The article is great. Precise and on point. I totally get what you are saying and although I thought I understood men, I was missing the final piece of the puzzle the winning part. What do you do in that type of situation? I had the same question. You said not to focus on his career. I might have misunderstood that. Perfect…exactly what I did! Thanks for the article! I have one question, and it is a bit long. So, there are three very beautiful girls standing side by side.

Each one has an entirely different personality, but they look identical. The first one is extremely confident and outgoing. She knows she is beautiful, smart, and an amazing person, but she can seem a little bitchy at times.

No matter how many times you compliment her, she refuses to believe it. She is kinda depressed, although she does an amazing job of hiding it. She is the kind of girl who would help everyone, despite the fact that she is in serious need of help herself but she would never ask.

Then the third girl is very complicated. She knows that she is beautiful, but sometimes she refuses to admit it. She likes to joke around about it too. She is hyperactive but also calm. She is humble but confident, and she is very smart. She is a sweet person, but sometimes a little bitch can show up. She immediately apologizes and feels bad if she says something rude, or if she hurts someone.

She tries her best to fix broken friendships even if they are beyond repair She alway tries to help, and she puts others before herself. A little greediness can show up once in a while, and sometimes she cries over random things.

She is emotional and moody. When she is in a relationship, she loves with all her heart. Her heart is very fragile. When it gets broken it takes forever to heal, and she builds bigger walls every time.

She is both shy and outgoing, depending on the situation. Now that you have the details, I would like to know which girl you like the most. Remember, all of them are gorgeous in your eyes. We have a sort of relationship,but not in public. We talk and text on telefon,meet each other for dinner or just a cup of coffee.

I sleep over once in a while. He knows that I want to make plans with him, want him to make me a priority. He has told me things from a earlier relationship. He has had hope for a new start.

I think he is a man that needs time to trust a woman again,but do you think i just hope to much? You are already being a doormat.

That is NOT a relationship. You have your answer. Yes, you are hoping too much. Thank You for your answer. I can see why your answer is like that. I wonder if we humans are to busy finding love, so we miss someone good, kind and gentle along the road……. I asked for advice. Your answer is to cut him off. Whom are you Carrie? We talk but he want me to fulfill his needs, then we can move on to the next step.

I could not agree more with most above statements. No one is attracted to desperation. I live a full, juicy, vibrant life outside, of dating. More, than one man at a time non sexually until exclusive. Anyhow, great article and I agree with points. Have a good evening! I actually even like just imagining showing someone something I truly enjoy, for this reason — it feels new each time. Especially if the guy tends to be more introverted, i. I disagree about sex being such a high-priority item in relationship building.

Based on my own observation and experience, if sex comes first, the relationship tends to stop there and not develop any further, 1. After talking to many thousands of men and women, I can tell you there are more examples than I can count of happy committed couples that had sex on the first date.

They committed to a deeper relationship not because of the sex, but because of the relationship. My opinion on it and all of what I write is just my opinion is that it puts the focus on the wrong things.

Worse, it maintains the false idea that the most valuable aspect of her is her sex and not the actual reasons why a man would want to choose her as a woman to connect to. Loved the introvert statement. Intorvert women are the same. It actually took a lot of energy for me to tell a guy that I felt that he was holding back. My live in boyfriend of 2 years issed me goodbye one morning to play golf with friend, said he loved me then didnt come home for 4 nights.

We did have the not ready talk the night before, but he said he didnt want to brreak up and I was the one. All five at once meant "activate" and "space. She had yet to meet someone who had been proved to be able to do that. She swung her arms a little out to the side, the only movement accommodated by the couch, and found the joy-stick trigger grip on the left, the attitude ball control on the right. Those were the controls for manual manoeuvring, and they would never be used.

Normally you just lay there and told Nightrider what to do. Otherwise you talked instructions into a key pad and then let the computation run the manoeuver In the real world, liquid breathing is a technique with applications to ultra-deep ocean diving. Past a certain depth the water pressure will crush a diver's lungs into pulp.

But since fluid is incompressible, filling the lungs with fluid instead of gasous breathing mix will provide protection. They do not quite have the technique ready for commercial use, yet, but they are working on it. A gentleman named Arnold Lande patented a liquid breathing scuba suit in You can see this in the movie The Abyss. The bit with the man is special effect, but the part with the rat is real.

Since multiple gravities of acceleration stress the internal organs much like water pressure, fluid breathing could provide acceleration protection as well. Liquid breathing is a form of respiration in which a normally air-breathing organism breathes an oxygen -rich liquid such as a perfluorocarbon , rather than breathing air. Perfluorochemical perfluorocarbon molecules have very different structures that impart different physical properties such as respiratory gas solubility, density, viscosity, vapor pressure, and lipid solubility.

Thus, it is critical to choose the appropriate PFC for a specific biomedical application, such as liquid ventilation, drug delivery or blood substitutes. The physical properties of PFC liquids vary substantially; however, the one common property is their high solubility for respiratory gases.

In fact, these liquids carry more oxygen and carbon dioxide than blood. In theory, liquid breathing could assist in the treatment of patients with severe pulmonary or cardiac trauma, especially in pediatric cases. Liquid breathing has also been proposed for use in deep diving and space travel. Despite some recent advances in liquid ventilation, a standard mode of application has not yet been established.

Liquid immersion provides a way to reduce the physical stress of G forces. Forces applied to fluids are distributed as omnidirectional pressures. Because liquids cannot be practically compressed, they do not change density under high acceleration such as performed in aerial maneuvers or space travel. A person immersed in liquid of the same density as tissue has acceleration forces distributed around the body, rather than applied at a single point such as a seat or harness straps.

This principle is used in a new type of G-suit called the Libelle G-suit, which allows aircraft pilots to remain conscious and functioning at more than 10 G acceleration by surrounding them with water in a rigid suit. Acceleration protection by liquid immersion is limited by the differential density of body tissues and immersion fluid, limiting the utility of this method to about 15 to 20 G. Extending acceleration protection beyond 20 G requires filling the lungs with fluid of density similar to water.

An astronaut totally immersed in liquid, with liquid inside all body cavities, will feel little effect from extreme G forces because the forces on a liquid are distributed equally, and in all directions simultaneously. However effects will be felt because of density differences between different body tissues, so an upper acceleration limit still exists.

Liquid breathing for acceleration protection may never be practical because of the difficulty of finding a suitable breathing medium of similar density to water that is compatible with lung tissue.

Perfluorocarbon fluids are twice as dense as water, hence unsuitable for this application. The acceleration shells were something new, installed while we rested and resupplied at Stargate.

They enabled us to use the ship at closer to its theoretical efficiency, the tachyon drive boosting it to as much as 25 gravities The medic came by and gave me my shot. I waited until and hollered to the squad, "Let's go. Strip down and zip up. The shell is like a flexible spacesuit; at least the fittings on the inside are pretty similar. But instead of a life support package, there's a hose going into the top of the helmet and two coming out of the heels, as well as two relief tubes per suit.

They're crammed in shoulder-to-shoulder on light acceleration couches; getting to your shell is like picking your way through a giant plate of olive drab spaghetti. When the lights in my helmet showed that everybody was suited up, I pushed the button that flooded the room. No way to see, of course, but I could imagine the pale blue solution—ethylene glycol and something else—foaming up around and over us.

The suit material, cool and dry, collapsed in to touch my skin at every point. I knew that my internal body pressure was increasing rapidly to match the increasing fluid pressure outside. That's what the shot was for; keep your cells from getting squished between the devil and the deep blue sea. You could still feel it, though. By the time my meter said "2" external pressure equivalent to a column of water two nautical miles deep , I felt that I was at the same time being crushed and bloated.

By it was at 2. When the maneuvers began at , you couldn't feel the difference. I thought I saw the needle fluctuate a tiny bit, though. The major drawback to the system is that, of course, anybody caught outside of his shell when the Anniversary hit 25 g 's would be just so much strawberry jam. So the guiding and the fighting have to be done by the ship's tactical computer—which does most of it anyway, but it's nice to have a human overseer. Another small problem is that if the ship gets damaged and the pressure drops, you'll explode like a dropped melon.

If it's the internal pressure, you get crushed to death in a microsecond. And it takes ten minutes, more or less, to get depressurized and another two or three to get untangled and dressed. So it's not exactly something you can hop out of and come up fighting. Foreseeably science fiction has several choice examples of acceleration protection constructed out of pure handwavium , mostly described as some kind of magic force field.

They are amusing but I wouldn't take any of them seriously. Common scifi names include acceleration compensator, deceleration compensator, inertial compensator, deceleration equalizer, and drive compensator. Sometimes scifi misuses the term " inertial damper " which has a very different and very mundane meaning, the proper term is Inertial Negation. In addition to the drives mentioned here, there is also the broad classs of carrot-on-a-stick drives.

These avoid killing the crew by high acceleration by virtue of using handwavium paragravity for acceleration. Since gravity or paragravity accelerates all the atoms of of both the ship and crew evenly, the crew will be in free fall regardless of how massive the acceleration is. An inertia damper is a device that counters or damps the effects of inertia and other forces and motion.

The damper does not negate the forces but either absorbs or redirects them by other means. For example, a large suspended mass may be used to absorb several short-duration large forces, and to reapply those forces as a smaller force over a longer period. The phrase inertial damper is actually misused in science fiction to describe a device that negates inertia and removes it from surrounding mass.

It is more properly described as inertia negation. Inertia negation is a hypothetical process causing physical objects with mass to act as if they were of lower mass or were massless. The effect is the opposite of adding ballast. No such process is known to exist in the real world: There is currently no known material or technology that is able to eliminate or negate the effects of inertia that all objects with mass possess.

According to Newton's first law , "A body will continue in its state of rest or of uniform motion in a straight line, unless compelled to change that state by a net force. Objects within objects each possess their own inertia, and will collide with each other when the containing object is moved.

A device that would be capable of inertia negation is described as being capable of reducing the inertia of both the larger containing object, and of all contained objects within, so as to make changes in motion easier, and to reduce or prevent damage due to internal collisions.

The inertia is not absorbed or redirected but simply ceases to have a physical effect. Antimatter , while being the opposite of matter , has the same kind of inertia, with the forces oriented in the same direction, as normal matter.

Thus, storing antimatter on board a vehicle made of matter would not achieve any kind of inertia negation. Inertia negation is a commonplace technology in numerous science fiction series. It is used as an explanation as to why the crew of starships can withstand complex maneuvres or acceleration to FTL speeds. Notable appearances include the Star Trek franchise, where inertial dampers protect the crew from the dangers of sudden accelerations. Another example is in the movie Alien.

In the fictional Mass Effect universe dark energy fields are used ubiquitously to modify mass of objects, e. Inertia negation is used to counter the effects of sudden acceleration that would impart structural stresses on star ships when suddenly accelerating to or decelerating with the impulse drive , and which would cause passengers to be thrown against walls and crushed by the inertial effects of the vehicle suddenly accelerating or slowing.

Such a device does not need to negate or alter inertia — a similar effect can be achieved by creating a gravitational field opposing the acceleration of the vessel. Such technology, while still nonexistent at the present time and considered unlikely to be achieved in the foreseeable future, is by far more realistic than manipulating inertial mass.

Inertial Dampening or "Damping", if you prefer your inertia dry is a piece of Applied Phlebotinum , designed to allow humans to accelerate and decelerate at high rates without becoming humorously colored paste on the walls.

In Real Life , "inertia dampers" refer only to devices or processes which remove the effects of inertia, not the inertia itself seeing as how the latter is impossible according to the currently-understood laws of physics.

Many of the examples on this page would thus be more correctly referred to as "inertial negation ". Its intention is to "take away" inertial effects; i.

For the most part, it's an invisible seatbelt substitute for crew and cargo. Sometimes Inertial Dampening has a "lag", where a sharp turn or quick deceleration will momentarily cause a reaction quick fall into the console or press back due to high accelerations.

Inertial Dampening is generally not Tim Taylor Technology. Generally, however, the Star Trek Shake has no relation to the direction of inertia; i. Though often left unmentioned, Inertial Dampening is a requisite side-technology to any spaceship that can turn or accelerate more quickly than a fighter jet.

Note that the physical Hand Wave that accompanies many forms of Faster-Than-Light Travel dictate that the ship does not accelerate in the traditional Newtonian or, for that matter, Einsteinian fashion, and so the inertial dampener is mostly for maneuvering and orbit changes.

In hard Sci-Fi , especially written but occasionally not, a more realistic method is used to cushion acceleration shock. Immersion in a fluid equal in density to the body would theoretically cause buoyancy forces to act counter to any accelerations; this is sometimes coupled with cryonics. Some method to allow the subject to continue to breathe in the fluid would be required, be it oxygenated liquids or a circulatory gas-exchange system.

Since people riding around in bathtubs are not interesting on-screen except from a voyeur's point-of-view this has only rarely trickled down to the big and small screens; the exploration ship Lewis and Clark in Event Horizon and presumably the cryonics pods in the Alien series are the exceptions.

See also Artificial Gravity. The tremendous accelerations involved in the kind of spaceflight seen on Star Trek would instantly turn the crew to chunky salsa unless there was some kind of heavy-duty protection.

Hence, the inertial damping field. The Next Generation Technical Manual, page For a space opera RPG setting I am considering adding inertia manipulation technology. But can one make a self-consistent inertia dampener without breaking conservation laws? What are the physical consequences? How many cool explosions, superweapons, and other tropes can we squeeze out of it? How to avoid the worst problems brought up by the SF community?

As Newton put it, inertia is the resistance of an object to a change in its state of motion. The mass in the formula is the inertial mass. Mass is a measure of how much there is of matter, and we normally multiply it with a hidden constant of 1 to get the inertial mass — this constant is what we will want to mess with.

There are relativistic versions of the laws of motion that handles momentum and inertia for high velocities, where the kinetic energy becomes so large that it starts to add mass to the whole system. This makes the total inertia go up, as seen by an outside observer, and looks like a nice case for inertia-manipulating tech being vaguely possible. However, Einstein threw a spanner into this: At least in my old school physics textbook early s! So, an inertia manipulation technology will have to imply some form of gravity manipulation technology.

Which may be fine from my standpoint, since what space opera is complete without antigravity? In fact, I already had decided to have Alcubierre warp bubble FTL anyway, so gravity manipulation is in. Let us posit that there is a magical field that allows us to dial up or down the proportionality constant for inertial mass: Let us assume the field is. Now the momentum and kinetic energy jumps by a factor of if the velocity remains unchanged.

Were I to catch the ball I would have gained times its original kinetic energy: Since we do not want that to be possible a space empire powered by throwing ping-pong balls sounds silly we must demand that energy is conserved.

One way of doing energy conservation is for the velocity to go down for my heavy ping-pong ball. This means that the new velocity will be. Inertia-increasing fields slow down objects, while inertia-decreasing fields speed them up.

One could have a force-field made of super-high inertia that would slow down incoming projectiles. At first this seems pointless, since once they get through to the other side they speed up and will do the same damage.

But we could of course put in a bunch of armour in this field, and have it resist the projectile. The kinetic energy will be the same but it will be a lower velocity collision which means that the strength of the armour has a better chance of stopping it in fact, as we will see below, we can use superdense armour here too. Consider the difference between being shot with a rifle bullet or being slowly but strongly stabbed by it: Definitely a good thing for a space opera.

A spacecraft that wants to get somewhere fast could just project a low field around itself and boost its speed by a huge factor. But now an impacting meteorite will both have an high relative speed, and when it enters the field get that boosted by the same factor again: So boosting your speed with a factor of a will give you dust hitting you at speeds a million times higher.

The armour above sounds like a good thing to have…. Note that any inertia-reducing technology is going to improve rockets even if there is no reactionless drive or other shenanigans: The rocket equation no longer bites: There is just a snag in this particular case: This kind of inertics does not make for a great cannon.

I can certainly make my projectile speed up a lot in the bore by lowering its inertia, but as soon as it leaves it will slow down. If we assume a given amount of force accelerating it along the length bore, it will pick up Joules of kinetic energy from the work the cannon does — independent of mass or inertia!

The difference may be power: Note that entering and leaving an inertics field will induce stresses. A metal rod entering an inertia-increasing field will have the part in the field moving more slowly, pushing back against the not slowed part yet another plus for the armour! When leaving the field the lighter part outside will pull away strongly.

Another effect of shifting velocities is that gases behave differently. At first it looks like changing speeds would change temperature since we tend to think of the temperature of a gas as how fast the molecules are bouncing around , but actually the kinetic temperature of a gas depends on you guessed it the average kinetic energy. However, the speed of sound should scale as: Air molecules inside an inertia-decreasing field would tend to leave more quickly than outside air would enter, producing a pressure difference.

Changing the velocity so that energy is conserved unfortunately has a drawback: I throw a heavy object at my inertics machine at velocity , momentum and energy , it reduces is inertia and increases the speed to , keeps the kinetic energy at , and the momentum is now.

What if we assume the momentum change comes from the field or machine? When I hit the mass machine with an object it experiences a force enough to change its velocity by. When set to increase inertia it is pushed back a bit, potentially moving up to speed. When set to decrease inertia it is pushed forward, starting to move towards the direction the object impacted from.

In fact, it can get arbitrarily large velocities by reducing close to 0. Demanding momentum and energy conservation requires giving the above formula and , which insists that.

Clearly we cannot have both. It is more obvious when you cheat about energy conservation. We could of course try to conserve 4-momentum , which would look like changing both energy and normal momentum at the same time. What about just retaining the normal momentum rather than the kinetic energy?

The new velocity would be , the new kinetic energy would be. Just like in the kinetic energy preserving case the object slows down or speeds up , but more strongly. And there is an energy debt of that needs to be fixed. One way of resolving energy conservation is to demand that the change in energy is supplied by the inertia-manipulation device.

My ping-pong ball does not change momentum, but requires 0. The device has to provide that. When the ball leaves the field there will be a surge of energy the device needs to absorb back. Some nice potential here for things blowing up in dramatic ways, a requirement for any self-respecting space opera. If I want to accelerate my spaceship in this setting, I would point my momentum vector towards the target, reduce my inertia a lot, and then have to provide a lot of kinetic energy from my inertics devices and power supply actually, store a lot — the energy is a surplus.

At first this sounds like it is just as bad as normal rocketry, but in fact it is awesome: I can convert my electricity directly into velocity without having to lug around a lot of reaction mass! I will even get it back when slowing down, a bit like electric brake regeneration systems. The rocket equation does not apply beyond getting some initial momentum. In fact, the less velocity I have from the start, the better.

One drawback is that now when I run into interplanetary dust it will drain my batteries as the inertics system needs to give it a lot of kinetic energy which will then go on harming me! This requires a privileged reference frame, throwing out relativity theory. Oops but not unexpected.

A rifle bullet has a few thousand Joules of energy, and if you can drain that it will now harmlessly bounce off your normal armour. Presumably shields will be depleted when the ship cannot dissipate or store the incoming kinetic energy fast enough, causing the inertics to overload and then leaving the ship unshielded.

This kind of inertics allows us to accelerate projectiles using the inertics technology, essentially feeding them as much kinetic energy as we want. If you first make your projectile super-heavy, accelerate it strongly, and then normalise the inertia it will now speed away with a huge velocity. A metal rod entering this kind of field will experience the same type of force as in the kinetic energy respecting model, but here the field generator will also be working on providing energy balance: Unfortunately it does not look like it could give a net energy gain by having matter flow through.

Note that this kind of device cannot be simply turned off like the previous one: The really tricky case is if you are in energy-debt: Now the object needs to get a bunch of kinetic energy from somewhere. Sudden absorption of nearby kinetic energy, freezing stuff nearby? That would break thermodynamics I could set up a perpetual motion heat engine this way. Leaving the inertia-changed object with the changed inertia?

That would mean there could be objects and particles with any effective mass — space might eventually be littered with atoms with altered inertia, becoming part of normal chemistry and physics. No such atoms have ever been found, but maybe that is because alien predecessor civilisations were careful with inertial pollution. Another approach is to say that we are manipulating spacetime so that inertial forces are cancelled by a suitable gravity force or, for purists, that the acceleration due to something gets cancelled by a counter-acceleration due to spacetime curvature that makes the object retain the same relative momentum.

The acceleration can be arbitrarily large but the crew will just experience freefall. Same thing for accelerating projectiles or making force-fields: Since momentum is conserved there will be recoil. The force-fields will however be wimpy: Given that normal interplanetary velocities are in tens of kilometres per second escape velocity of Earth, more or less the gravity field needs to be many, many Gs to work.

Make a wheel turn because of an attracting and repulsing field, and the generator has to pay the work plus experience a torque. Make a spacecraft go from point A to B, and it needs to pay the potential energy difference, momentum change, and at least temporarily the gain in kinetic energy. Note that energy and momentum in general relativity are only locally conserved ; at least this kind of drive can handwave some excuse for breaking local momentum conservation by positing that the momentum now resides in an extended gravity field and maybe gravitational waves.

One problem is edge tidal effects. Somewhere there is going to be a transition zone where there is a field gradient: Conversely, this makes for a nifty weapon ripping apart targets. One problem with gravity manipulation is that it normally has to occur through gravity, which is both very weak and only has positive charges. Electromagnetic technology works so well because we can play positive and negative charges against each other, getting strong effects without using very enormous numbers of electrons.

Gravity and gravitomagnetic effects normally only occurs due to large mass-energy densities and momenta. So for this to work there better be antigravitons, negative mass, or some other way of making gravity behave differently from vanilla relativity. Inertics can typically handwave something about the Higgs field at least. This leaves out the gravity part and just posits that you can place force vectors wherever you want. A bit like Iain M. No real constraints because it is entirely made-up physics; it is not clear it respects any particular conservation laws.

Here are some of the nontrivial effects of changing inertia of matter I will leave out gravity manipulation, which has more obvious effects. It is worth noting that this thought experiment does not affect light and other electromagnetic fields: The overall effect is that they will tend to push around charged objects in the field more or less. A low-inertia electron subjected to a given electric field will accelerate more, a high-inertia electron less.

This in turn changes the natural frequencies of many systems: A receiver inside the inertics field will experience outside signals as being stronger if the field decreases inertia or weaker if it increases it. Reducing inertia also increases the Bohr magneton ,. This means that paramagnetic materials become more strongly affected by magnetic fields, and that ferromagnets are boosted. Conversely, higher inertia reduces magnetic effects. Changing inertia would likely change atomic spectra see below and hence optical properties of many compounds.

Many pigments gain their colour from absorption due to conjugated systems think of carotene or heme that act as antennas: Carotene with increased inertia will presumably shift its absorption spectra towards lower frequencies, becoming redder, while lowered inertia causes a green or blue shift.

An interesting effect is that the rhodopsin in the eye will also be affected and colour vision will experience the same shift objects will appear to change colour in regions with a different from the place where the observer is, but not inside their field. Strong enough fields will cause shifts so that absorption and transmission outside the visual range will matter, e.

However, the above claim that photons should not be affected by inertia manipulation may not have to hold true. Photons carry momentum, where k is the wave vector. This would complicate things a lot, so I will leave analysis to the interested reader. But it would likely make inertics fields visible due to refractive effects. One area inertics would mess up is chemistry. Chemistry is basically all about the behaviour of the valence electrons of atoms.

And this equation has a dependency on the mass of the electron and nucleus. If we look at hydrogen-like atoms , the main effect is that the energy levels become.

In short, the inertial manipulation field scales the energy levels up and down proportionally. One effect is that it becomes much easier to ionise low-inertia materials, and that materials that are normally held together by ionization bonds say NaCl salt may spontaneously decay when in high-inertia fields.

The Bohr radius scales as: This really messes with materials. Placed in a low-inertia field atoms expand, making objects such as metals inflate. In a high inertia-field, electrons keep closer to the nuclei and objects shrink. As distances change, the effects of electromagnetic forces also change: Not to mention melting points: This size change also affects the electron-electron interactions, which among other things shield the nucleus and reduce the effective nuclear charge.

The changed energy levels do not strongly affect the structure of the lightest atoms, so they will likely form the same kind of chemical bonds and have the same chemistry. However, heavier atoms such as copper, chromium and palladium already have ordering rules that are slightly off because of the quirks of the energy levels. As the field deviates from 1 we should expect lighter and lighter atoms to get alternative filling patterns and this means they will get different chemistry. Given that copper and chromium are essential for some enzymes, this does not bode well — if copper no longer works in cytochrome oxidase, the respiratory chain will lethally crash.

If we allow permanently inertia-altered particles chemistry can get extremely weird. An inertia-changed electron would orbit in a different way than a normal one, giving the atom it resided in entirely different chemical properties. Each changed electron could have its own individual inertia. Presumably such particles would randomise chemistry where they resided, causing all sorts of odd reactions and compounds not normally seen.

The overall effect would likely be pretty toxic, since it would on average tend to catalyze metastable high-energy, low-entropy structures in biochemistry to fall down to lower energy, higher entropy states. Lowering inertia in many ways looks like heating up things: Given that much of biochemistry is tremendously temperature dependent, this suggests that even slight changes of to 0.

Inside a lowered inertia field matter responds more strongly to forces, and this means that fluids flow faster for the same pressure difference.

Buoyancy cases stronger convection. For a given velocity, the inertial forces are reduced compared to the viscosity, lowering the Reynolds number and making flows more laminar. Conversely, enhanced inertia fluids are hard to get to move but at a given speed they will be more turbulent. I have ignored the equivalence of inertial and gravitational mass.

One way for me to get away with it is to claim that they are still equivalent, since everything occurs within some local region where my inertics field is acting: The equivalence principle still holds. What if there is no equivalence principle? I could make 1 kg object and a 1 gram object fall at different accelerations. If I had a massless spring between them it would be extended, and I would gain energy. Beside the work done by gravity to bring down the objects which I could collect and use to put them back where they started I would now have extra energy — aha, another perpetual motion machine!

So we better stick to the equivalence principle. Given that boosting inertia makes matter both tend to shrink to denser states and have more gravitational force, an important worldbuilding issue is how far I will let this process go. Using it to help fission or fusion seems fine. Allowing it to squeeze matter into degenerate states or neutronium might be more world-changing.

And easy making of black holes is likely incompatible with the survival of civilisation. If you model it using spherical Bondi accretion you need an Earth-mass black hole to make the sun implode within a year or so, and a kg asteroid mass black hole to implode the Earth. And the extreme luminosity slows things a lot more. A better way may be to use an evaporating black hole to irradiate the solar system instead, or blow up something sending big fragments.

Another fun use of inertics is of course to mess up stars directly. Conversely, reducing inertia may open a channel where it is easier for plasma from the interior to ascend especially since it would be lighter. Even if one cannot turn this into a black hole or trigger surface fusion, it might enable directed flares as the plasma drags electromagnetic field lines with it. The probe was invisible on the monitor, but its effects were obvious: Suddenly there was a tiny glint in the middle and a shock-wave: Mad science clearly has no good concept of proper workmanship.

This is mad engineering: Without the probe sucking it together the dense plasma was now wildly expanding. As it expanded it cooled. Beyond a certain point it became too cold to remain plasma: Suddenly neutral the matter no longer constrained the tortured magnetic field lines and they snapped together at the speed of light. In both cases where actual inertia is changed inertics fields appear pretty lethal.

A brief brush with a weak field will likely just be incapacitating, but prolonged exposure is definitely going to kill. And extreme fields are going to do very nasty stuff to most normal materials — making them expand or contract, melt, change chemical structure and whatnot. Hence spacecraft, cannons and other devices using inertics need to be designed to handle these effects. One might imagine placing the crew compartment in a counter-inertics field keeping while the bulk of the spacecraft is surrounded by other fields.

A failure of this counter-inertics field does not just instantly turn the crew into tuna paste, but into blue toxic tuna paste. Gravity manipulation is cleaner, but this is not necessarily a plus from the cool fiction perspective: The atomic rocket page makes a big deal out of how reactionless propulsion makes space opera destroying weapons of mass destruction if every tramp freighter can be turned into a relativistic missile, how long is the Imperial Capital going to last?

This is a smaller problem here: Gravity propulsion still enables some nasty relativistic weaponry, and if you spend time adding kinetic energy to your inertia-reduced missile it can become pretty nasty. But even if the reactionless aspect does not trivially produce WMDs inertia manipulation will produce a fair number of other risky possibilities.

However, given that even a normal space freighter is a hypervelocity missile, the problem lies more in how to conceptualise a civilisation that regularly handles high-energy objects in the vicinity of centres of civilisation.

Not discussed here are issues of how big the fields can be made. Could we reduce the inertia of an asteroid or planet, sending it careening around? That has some big effects on the setting. Similarly, how small can we make the inertics: Can they be counteracted by another field? Inertia-changing devices are really tricky to get to work consistently; most space opera SF using them just conveniently ignores the mess — just like how FTL gives rise to time travel or that talking droids ought to transform the global economy totally.

But it is fun to think through the awkward aspects, since some of them make the world-building more exciting. The proper adjustments being made, Leonora Cnristine raised her acceleration a few days later. It would make no particular difference to the cosmic duration of her passage. In either case, she ran at the heels of light. Extending her scoopfields more widely, intensifying the thermonuclear fireball that trailed her trailing Bussard engine, the ship shifted over to three gravities. This would have added almost thirty meters per second per second to a low velocity.

To her present speed, it added tiny increments which grew constantly tinier. That was in outside measurement. Inboard, she drove ahead at three gee; and that measurement was equally real. Her human payload could not have taken it and lived long. The stress on heart, lungs, and especially on body fluid balance would have been too great.

Drugs might have helped. Fortunately, there was a better way. The forces that pushed her nearer and nearer to ultimate c were not merely enormous. Of necessity, they were precise. They were, indeed, so precise that their interaction with the outside universe — matter and its own force fields — could be held to a nearly constant resultant in spite of changes in those exterior conditions.

Likewise, the driving energies could safely be coupled to similar, much weaker fields when the latter were established within the hull. This linkage could then operate on the asymmetries of atoms and molecules to produce an acceleration uniform with that of the inside generator itself.

Guys Seeking Sex Now in All Cities. Post Your Ad . I like looking for a man who wants a good blowjob and maybe wants to fuck. I like to My cock is cut like a rock clean shave smooth body. I dont mind BOTTOM GUY NEEDS TOP MAN. bi male If you're a bit aggressive/verbal/hung,multi-cummer +++++ cum on by!!!. Are you a milf in good shape and clean with a really hairy pussy that needs oral attention? My kik is johny_monroe I am 21 Hispanic male I have a good job I drive and I Re: Looking for someone to hang out with during the week w4w I WON Senior searching casual porno Rock Springs |Housewives want casual sex. A brunette is getting on her knees to give a blow job in public. 6 2. Duration: Girlfriend with great tits and her man fucking in the kitchen Girlfriend.