Adult sex on the Annapolis Maryland Adult sex on the Annapolis Maryland Register Login Contact Us

Ontario fucking lady looking man


Ontario fucking lady looking man

Online: Now

About

If you are frustrated with this section Ontario fucking lady looking man Ontsrio with shallow or misogynistic or creepy men, or even normal men interested only in NSA or FWB, please understand that what attracts them to overrun this place is women posting ads waiting for these things, or hinting at these things, or with motivations Dublin horny women than 'Strictly Platonic'. Waiting to get into something m4w hello, girls.

Mattie
Age:46
Relationship Status:Single
Seeking:I Am Seeking Real Swingers
City:Northridge
Hair:Long
Relation Type:Lonely Married Wanting Latina Looking For Sex

Ontario fucking lady looking man

My Wife Needs A Fucking Tonight

I apologize. Send a chat if you think you would be open to this.

Heartbroken m4w Today was supposed to be a day of celebration. Either boston or tyson mall will work well. Looking for someone 35-50 only. Im open to all races and sizes, all that I ask is that you be sane, alone, and a mature adult.

For simplicity, this page may now be cited as www. It has been known since antiquity that the foreskin gives pleasure , and only forgotten in the US in the last century or so. Central to Intactivist claims about foreskin function in sex is the work of Taylor et al. They make the foreskin's sensitivity comparable to that of the fingertips or the lips but probably less than that of the tip of the tongue or the eyelashes. The ridged band now has its own website , hosted by its discoverer, Dr John Taylor.

Anatomically and physiologically, the skin of the penis is designed to activate the male sexual reflex mechanism. To perform this interesting function it is richly endowed with smooth muscle fibres that cause its upper, sexual contact surface to 'firm up' and wrinkle - and become much more frictional - during erection. During vaginal intromission these conformational changes in penile skin ensure stretching of ridged band and reflex contraction of bulb muscles.

In short, the penile skin behaves in exactly the same way, during erection, as scrotal skin. Almost certainly, uniquely-structuresd penile and scrotal skin play an important role in activating and moderating erogenous sensation and sexual reflexes for ejacuation. As far as I know, there is no female equivalent. In short, male circumcision completely alters the way male sexual sensations and reflexes are generated during vaginal intercourse. The role of the foreskin in intercourse The movement of the foreskin is unique.

On the in-stroke of intercourse, considered from the point of view of its stationary outer layer, the inner layer rolls outward and applies itself to the vagina. The ridged band engages with the internal ridges of the vagina. On the out-stroke, that movement reverses. Depending on the various dimensions and techniques used, there is considerable variation from that basic pattern and the two sets of ridges may then rub over each other like clothes on an old-fashioned washboard.

That might be painful for women if the foreskin were dry like the circumcised penis. Instead, the effect is pleasurable. What happens with me is that during entry into the vagina, the labia minora inner vaginal lips catches the foreskin and retracts it behind the ridge of the glans.

That's where it stays until intercourse is complete and the erection subsides. My partner tells me that this is the normal course of events if the foreskin does not retract on its' own when it becomes erect. The labia minora are so shaped as to catch under the edge of the foreskin, which is usually partially retracted, and push it back. The exposed glans is then exposed to the full friction of the vaginal walls when thrusting.

This is one of the variations. The ridged band is in intimate contact with the labia minora rather than the vaginal walls, another kind of intimacy unavailable to the circumcised man.

Moderate stretching of the foreskin may also be pleasurable for the man. This gives rise to the "balloon job" - inflating the foreskin - possible only for an intact man. Air should not be forced down the urethra, and on no account should high-pressure air supplies be used. European girls know how to suck the European c ck.

They are soft and nice and gentle and they know that. Because we're more sensitive so we need a gentle treatment. Yeah because if you're circumcised it means you're not as sensitive and so the girls have to be rough. AlterNet April 15, I have tried to live without regret and I swore when I got circumcised, I would never regret it.

I now live with that regret. I am reminded of this regret every time I am intimate with a partner. With my foreskin went a wonderful degree of sensuality and sensitivity that I will never get back and never knew I would miss until it was gone. I had a whole lot of experience with a foreskin before I was cut and a whole lot of experience without one after I was cut.

I am in a very good position to speak on the subject clearly since I have experienced both sides of the issue for long periods of time. I want to scream when I hear parents making the choice to mutilate their child for cleanliness, aesthetics or misplaced notions of health. With a few necessary medical exceptions, this is barbarity and it is mutilating your son in the most intimate of ways.

My penis was always clean, happy and wonderful. Now part of it, a truly wonderful part of it is gone and restoration will not bring it back. It should be illegal to do this to children. If they want to do so later on their journey through this life, when they are adults for whatever reason, religious or otherwise, let them. No one should mutilate children at an age especially when they can not consent to it.

I totally, agree with you. I too, have been on both sides of this issue having my "child-hood operation" at the age of 24 or 25 yrs. It was done for medical reasons and had nothing to do with any of the other reasons associated with having it done. One does lose a lot of sensitivity removing the foreskin. It offers many functions from protection of the glans to lubrication of it.

When the glans is continually, exposed to the elements, it loses sensitivity. I think all reasons for removing it save, medically, are not worth mutilating a functioning piece of anatomy.

I was cut as an adult medical error , so I know the difference. So you see, I can't regard circumcision as anything but absolutely evil. As far as I am concerned, anyone who performs a circumcision is even more depraved than someone who would rape that same child. I was intact until I was 19, and after some bad medical advice I was circumcised. There is no comparison in sensation - before I had an exquisitely sensitive sexual organ. Now the sensation is nil.

I have erectile dysfunction and do not orgasm. I wish every day I could go back and not make that mistake. It has totally destroyed my life. When I was younger I lived in Italy and the men I had sex with were very vocal and ecstatic in their lovemaking, and specifically in their orgasmic voice. Back in the USA my boyfriends did not express sexual pleasure the same way. They would kind of grunt, set their jaw or say, "Oh God, I'm going to cum!

I thought that it was a cultural thing, that somehow the Italians had learned to express themselves like some women learn to fake noises to thrill their partner and the American guys had conversly learned to supress their expression of their feelings. At the time I didn't make a connection, I thought it had to do with Italian vs.

Then, years later, I had a British boyfriend who was culturally much more like an American than like an Italian, but when he came he sang and cried out - not with a feminine voice, but with a passion that was "feminine" only in as much as - in my American world - women have it and men don't At that point I was able to see that it was not Italians vs Americans, but Intact men vs circumcised men.

It was a very sad realization. Although I will never know what they were actually feeling - how it was different - I do know that what I could see and hear and feel as an observer there seemed to be a dramatic difference. Ooh, and here's the best part. Okay, girls who have done it with a cut penis, hopefully you know what I mean Not, like, ouch, knife sharp but more like Well when the penis has foreskin, that sensation isn't there.

Entry feels a lot smoother and to me that's much more enjoyable. And you know that drop of pre-ejaculate pre cum in laymen's terms? Well when I was with circumcized guys that was kind of like "ew, wipe it off" but with foreskin that drop of fluid is preserved and serves as a lubricant for the man. Know what that means? No rawness or chafing after repeated intercourse! The extra skin is like having an extra ridge there. When I have children, I won't have the boys circumcised, because I want their wives to be very happy.

It's almost like he has a cock ring on. You know those condoms that have the big ridges on them? Well, that's what it's like. Besides, a dick is a dick. It just looks a little different. And my boyfriend's is the perfect size.

You usually don't remember how big men's dick's are, but you remember the really small ones. Girth matters and size and length matter. Basically, I have to have a perfect dick. And now I've got the length and the girth and a bonus I didn't even know existed. The foreskin is my go-to guy when I'm lazy during BJ or handjobs! It's the dick that strokes itself! My sons will NOT be cut! I think the increased sexual pleasure far outweighs the rare risk of problems which still can be handled later in life if need be.

One I was with for over 10 years, so I certainly would have known. When I discovered my current significant other was uncircumcised, I felt I had hit the jackpot!

The Foreskin, Circumcision and Sexuality

This knowledge hopefully can help doctors and patients in their decision on circumcision for non-medical reason. To test the hypothesis that sensitivity of the foreskin is a substantial part of male penile sensitivity.

To determine the effects of male circumcision on penile sensitivity in a large sample. Given the intimate nature of the questions and the intended large sample size, the authors decided to create an online survey. Respondents were recruited by means of leaflets and advertising. The analysis sample consisted of uncircumcised and circumcised men. For the glans penis, circumcised men reported decreased sexual pleasure and lower orgasm intensity.

They also stated more effort was required to achieve orgasm , and a higher percentage of them experienced unusual sensations burning, prickling, itching, or tingling and numbness of the glans penis. For the penile shaft a higher percentage of circumcised men described discomfort and pain, numbness and unusual sensations. In comparison to men circumcised before puberty, men circumcised during adolescence or later indicated less sexual pleasure at the glans penis, and a higher percentage of them reported discomfort or pain and unusual sensations at the penile shaft.

This study confirms the importance of the foreskin for penile sensitivity, overall sexual satisfaction, and penile functioning. Furthermore, this study shows that a higher percentage of circumcised men experience discomfort or pain and unusual sensations as compared with the uncircumcised population. Before circumcision without medical indication, adult men, and parents considering circumcision of their sons, should be informed of the importance of the foreskin in male sexuality.

The entire basis of the claim that circumcision has no effect on sexuality was until recently an "experiment" performed over 40 years ago by William H. Masters MD and Virginia E. Johnson and reported in their best-seller, "Human Sexual Response".

Their bias toward circumcision and their ignorance of the intact penis are manifest. Their first picture, of the "normal" anatomy, shows no sign of a foreskin. What is labelled "coronal ridge" looks more like a circumcision scar. The corona glandis is actually the high point to the left of that. They look as though someone unfamiliar with the foreskin added it to a diagram of a circumcised penis, but it is still not identified.

None of the pictures of erections show that the foreskin can retract, or how. Thank heaven an erection is usually "Reversible"! This is actually a picture of a dissected penis from below with all skin removed: Their discussion of circumcision pp begins with a claim that because only 16 actually 9 according to their own table of the men aged were intact compared to 26 of the 81 older men , there was "a medical trend toward urging routine circumcision of the newborn male infant.

They also assume their sample of volunteers who were comfortable having sex in front of the experimenters was representative of the whole population of the US, and the 35 intact ones representative of all intact men. The phallic fallacy that the uncircumcised male can establish ejaculatory control more effectively than his circumcised counterpart was accepted almost universally as biologic fact by both circumcised and uncircumcised male study subjects.

Magazines like Penthouse were suggesting that intact men with premature ejaculation might get circumcised to prevent it. All involved in this fallacy seem to have been unaware that the foreskin can retract. Masters and Johnson ignore the possiblity that the foreskin itself is involved in sexual sensation. A limited number of the male study-subject population was exposed to a brief clinical experiment designed to disprove [ Real scientists aim to test, not prove or disprove ] the false premise [ If it had not yet been disproved, how did they know it was false?

The 35 uncircumcised males were matched at random with circumcised study subjects of similar ages. Routine neurologic testing for both exteroceptive and light tactile discrimination were conducted on the ventral and dorsal surfaces of the penile body, with particular attention directed toward the glans.

It is unclear what "particular attention" means. It goes without saying that no attention was given to the foreskin, nor could it be with the circumcised "male study subjects".

Masters and Johnson didn't find what they weren't looking for. It had nothing to do with sex. An elaborate explanation of this "finding" follows, based on Masters and Johnson's observation that 29 out of the 35 "uncircumcised male study subjects" had foreskins that retracted during intercourse. They were apparently previously unaware that foreskins usually retract. Uncircumcised males have not been observed to concentrate specifically on the glans area of the penis.

They were playing with their much more sensitive foreskins but Masters and Johnson failed to notice that. Stroking techniques rarely move sufficiently distal on the shaft of the penis to encounter more than the coronal ridge of the glans even late in plateau phase just before ejaculation.

Masters and Johnson conspicuously fail to notice a common technique of intact men, of using only one or two fingers and the thumb to move the foreskin on and off the glans - which contrasts sharply with the furious grasping, squeezing and grinding of the shaft and glans by circumcised men.

Masters and Johnson's only interest in the foreskin in intercourse is whether it covers the glans:. This is obviously a different picture from that occasioned by active intercourse. With full vaginal containment the foreskin not tightly attached to subjacent tissue usually retracts freely from a major portion of the glans during active male coital thrusting before ejaculation.

On this was based the whole of the case that "circumcision has no effect on sexual function" until further studies with flaws of their own see below were used to make the same claim. Extensive neurological testing of such sensations as touch and pain sensitivity failed to reveal any differences in those with and without foreskins. In "Healthy Sex" by Miriam Stoppard Dorling Kindersley , the claim about a myth of greater control by intact men, and the alleged reason for it, is paraphrased almost verbatim, without acknowledgement.

In January , PhD student Tina Kimmel tried to find out just what the experiments were that have proved so influential in maintaining the claim that "circumcision has no effect on sexuality".

Masters, 85, was in a nursing home in Arizona with Parkinson's disease and had no memory of the experiments. He died a few weeks later. Collaborator Robert Kolodny said that he never once heard Masters or Johnson refer to this study, but thought Masters might have done it in collaboration with his physiologist at the time, Dr.

Kolodny says most of the research notes from that period have been discarded, because of the rising costs of storage. He guessed that "light tactile discrimination" meant single-point threshold sensitivity, although he had no idea what "exteroceptive discrimination" meant.

Ms Kimmel could not reach Virginia Johnson in St. Louis, but everyone she spoke to thought Johnson was most probably not involved in the study at all. In sharp contrast is the importance Masters and Johnson attach to the role of the clitoral hood female prepuce in intercourse: A mechanical traction develops on both sides of the clitoral hood of the minor labia subsequent to penile distention of the vaginal outlet.

With active penile thrusting, the clitoral body is pulled downward toward the pudendum [ Masters and Johnson define the "pudendum" as "the mons pubis, labia majora, labia minora, and the vestibule of the vagina". When the penile shaft is in the withdrawal phase of active coital stroking, traction on the clitoral hood is somewhat relieved and the body and glans return to normal pudendal-overhang positioning If the vaginal outlet is too expanded to allow strong traction on the minor-labial hood by the thrusting penis, minimal clitoral excursion will occur and little if any secondary stimulation will develop.

But the role they attach to the female prepuce is still a passive one, and they do not consider the possibility that it may be the source of erotic sensation in its own right, either. In response to an enquiry about the role of the clitoral hood, "Charlou" at RichardDawkins. Direct stimulation of my clitoris concentrates the sensation too intensely for me, particularly close to and during clitoral orgasm.

Manipulation over and around the hood and labia is both exquisitely pleasurable and extends the orgasm. Often controlling and delaying the clitoral orgasm this way generates a deeper internal orgasm. A more recent study makes the same mistake, perhaps more glaringly. Abstract of a paper presented at a meeting of the American Urological Association in Chicago on April 29, Controversy continues to exist about the effect of circumcision on penile sensitivity and sexual satisfaction.

This study was designed to evaluate penile sensitivity in both circumcised and uncircumcised males. We evaluated both large and small axon nerve fibers using vibration, pressure, spatial perception, and warm and cold thermal thresholds. Measurements both in functional men and men with erectile dysfunction ED were obtained to evaluate for differences in penile sensitivities. Seventy-nine patients were evaluated.

Patients were subsequently tested on the dorsal midline glans of the penis. In uncircumcised males, the foreskin was retracted for testing.

However, significance was lost when we controlled for age, hypertension, and diabetes. We also found that overall race is related to circumcision status with Caucasian men 25 times and African American men 8 times more likely to be circumcised than Hispanics.

An enormous amount hangs on that one circumcised Hispanic man: This is irrelevant to sensitivity, but its innumeracy casts grave doubt on the rest of the research. We present a comparative analysis between uncircumcised and circumcised men using a battery of quantitative somatosensory tests that evaluate the spectrum of small to large axon nerve fibers.

We demonstrated that there are no significant differences in penile [ glans ] sensation between [ these ] circumcised and uncircumcised men with respect to vibration, spatial perception, pressure, warm and cold thermal thresholds in both patients with and without erectile dysfunction. Little is known about the long-term implications of neonatal circumcision on the penile sensitivity of adult men, despite recent public policy endorsing the procedure in the United States.

A total of 62 men age 18 to 37 years, mean Men with sexual dysfunction were excluded by design. It would be surprising if this tested any differently from the rest of the shaft.

Penile sensitivity [ at those three points on the cut penis ] did not differ across circumcision status for any stimulus type or penile site. The foreskin of intact men was more sensitive to tactile stimulation than the other penile sites , but this finding did not extend to any other stimuli where foreskin sensitivity was comparable to the other sites tested. This self-evident observation is the elephant in the room.

However, given the high prevalence of fine-touch pressure receptors Meissner corpuscles in the preputial mucosa, this finding was not unexpected. They express the result in this graphic colouring and emphasis mine: It glosses over the fact that the cut men have no foreskin sensitivity whatsoever. Findings suggest that minimal long-term implications for penile sensitivity exist as a result of the surgical excision of the foreskin during neonatal circumcision [ If you ignore the fact that you are significantly reducing the total innervation of the penis.

Results are relevant to policy makers, parents of male children [ but not to adult men? Riverside Professional Center, Ottawa, Canada. Research, theory, and popular belief all suggest that penile sensation is greater in the uncircumcised as compared with the circumcised man. However, research involving direct measurement of penile sensation has been undertaken only in sexually functional and dysfunctional groups, and as a correlate of sexual behavior.

There are no reports of penile sensation in sexually aroused subjects, and it is not known how arousal affects sensation. In principle, this should be more closely related to actual sexual function.

This study therefore compared genital and nongenital sensation as a function of sexual arousal in circumcised and uncircumcised men. Twenty uncircumcised men and an equal number of age-matched circumcised participants underwent genital and nongenital sensory testing at baseline and in response to erotic and control stimulus films.

Touch and pain thresholds were assessed on the penile shaft, the glans penis, [ but not the foreskin ] and the volar surface of the fore arm. In response to the erotic stimulus, both groups evidenced a significant increase in penile temperature, which correlated highly with subjective reports of sexual arousal. Uncircumcised men had significantly lower penile temperature than circumcised men, and evidenced a larger increase in penile temperature with sexual arousal.

Since they ignore the foreskin, they also ignore the fact that the foreskin rolls back on arousal, so that mucosa is exposed on both.

No differences in genital sensitivity were found between the uncircumcised and circumcised groups. Uncircumcised men were less sensitive to touch on the forearm than circumcised men [ Suggesting overall hypersensitivity is a long-term consequence of circumcision? A decrease in overall touch sensitivity was observed in both groups with exposure to the erotic film as compared with either baseline or control stimulus film conditions.

No significant effect was found for pain sensitivity. These results do not support the hypothesized penile sensory differences associated with circumcision [ so long as you ignore the foreskin ]. However, group differences in penile temperature and sexual response were found. It is possible that the uncircumcised penis is more sensitive due to the presence of additional sensory receptors on the prepuce and frenulum, [ Possible?

It should be blindingly obvious. The receptors a baby is born with are not "additional" ] but this cannot be compared with the absence of such structures on the circumcised penis. They could have compared the senstivitities of the prepuce and intact frenulum with those of the glans and shaft. Note also that this perfectly reasonable supposition is demoted to a "notion". This may have led to the general notion that circumcised men were somehow "less sexual" and therefore less "sexually sensitive" than uncircumcised men.

These pages consider other effects of glans exposure. In light of these findings, the examination of penile sensory diffrences between uncircumcised and circumcised men warrants further study via a replication with a larger sample size [ Sorrells et al. The guide for the perplexed. University of Chicago Press; Clitoridectomy, circumcision, and the politics of sexual pleasure.

Sexualities in Victorian Britain. Indiana University Press; The authors of this study tried as hard as they could to ignore the effect of circumcision.

Ranked by degree of 'sexual pleasure', the area 'underside of the glans' was highest, followed by 'underside of the penile shaft', 'upper side of the glans', 'left and right sides of the glans', 'one or both sides of the penis', 'upper side of the penile shaft', 'foreskin' 11 subjects , 'skin between the scrotum and anus', 'back side of the scrotum', 'front side of the scrotum', and 'around anus', but not all pair differences were significant.

Given that this was a largely healthy sample with no history of genital surgery , the initial ratings of genital anatomy, which showed little variability, are not described here. Ranked by degree of 'sexual pleasure' Table 1 , the area 'underside of the glans' [ Yes, the frenulum, in circumcised men the last remnant of Taylor's ridged band ] was highest, followed by 'underside of the penile shaft', 'upper side of the glans', 'left and right sides of the glans', 'one or both sides of the penis', 'upper side of the penile shaft' ' foreskin ' [ apparently they merged foreskin measurements with upper shaft measurements for no apparent reason ] , 'skin between the scrotum and anus', 'back side of the scrotum', 'front side of the scrotum', and 'around anus', but not all pair differences were significant.

Surgical modification or removal of genital tissue, as it occurs in genital reconstruction surgery or circumcision , increases the potential [ just the potential? Some intersex activists have even called for a moratorium on genital surgery, until more adequate followup data are provided [29]. Is that so outlandish, just to be left alone?

Men with a history of genital masculinizing surgery or genital excision surgery were excluded. Circumcision status was documented, but this genital surgery was not an exclusion criterion. If it had been an exclusion criterion, they would only have had 11 subjects!

Intact and circumcised subjects should certainly have been treated separately on all measures. The present study provided somewhat surprising data on orgasmic sensitivity. Both the ventral penile shaft and the area of the ventral glans penis were rated at an almost equal level of orgasmic sensitivity and sexual pleasure, significantly above the levels of all other areas rated.

This is different from what might be expected, considering the nerve density shown by Yucel and Baskin's example of the fetal penis. The terminal nerves there end in the foreskin and dorsal glans. The difference noted in the present study might be a consequence of the high circumcision rate of the respondents of the study. When terminal nerves are excised, a dermatome [area of skin served by one spinal nerve] might migrate.

It could also be that sexual sensitivity ratings include a pressure-related sensation rather than only a fine-touch or tactile sensation. Removal of the foreskin does affect the surface of the glans. It becomes keratanised , covered in a hardened coating. This shields the nerves of the glans from stimulation.

These two effects together combine to change the quality, and reduce the quantity, of sensitivity of circumcised men. The neurology has not been studied in detail, but other work suggests that when nerves are severed in infancy they reconfigure themselves -.

Fetal and infant brains exhibit an admirable adaptability to unique developmental conditions—whether those conditions are unique to individuals within a species as with armless wonders [people born without arms] or are unique among species as with jerboas [long-legged jumping rats]. Predetermined brain function is neither feasible nor desired.

That individuals can exhibit compensatory responses to sensory loss might be familiar even to people who have not met an "armless wonder. There is now evidence that it does. For example, in congenially blind humans, the part of the cerebral cortex that, in sighted people, would process light arriving from the eyes is recruited to process tactile information arriving from the fingers.

Thus, even after millions of years of processing visual information, the mammalian "visual" cortex remains open to inputs from other sensory systems. This reorganization of the cerebral cortex also has been observed in short-tailed opossums that were experimentally blinded soon after birth. When their adult brains were examined, sensory maps of the brain surface showed extensive encroachment of the areas responding to sound and touch into areas that, in a sighted animal, would respond only to light.

We might say that in the absence of visual stimulation, the visual cortex is colonized by other sensory systems. But this instruction is not mindless. We know from research in human adults that experience sach as playing a stringed instrument—can modify cortical organization. Such experience is even more profound in early infancy, when the most fundamental relationships between peripheral structures and the brain—and among systems within the brain—are being established. When new sensory structures arise One neuro-scientist sums up these relationships in one simple sentence: But such lessons in memorization are rarely accompanied by the caveat that our current discussion demands: Thus, our brains are not preprogrammed to expect the presence of any appendage, whether arms, legs [or] eyes Rather, it is the reliability of sensory targeting and other developmental factors that produces the illusion of a preprogrammed brain.

In their place, we would discover enlarged representations of legs, feet, and toes. In its place, we would discover an enlarged representation of the glans and frenulum. This suggests that men circumcised in adulthood react differently from men circumcised as babies: All of us must learn how our particular bodies work.

We are not hardwired for sex and there is no innate instruction manual. Getting sex right, for our partners and us, entails many trials and a lot of errors. As with any learning process, feedback is essential. Slicing away at sexual organs to produce a cosmetic improvement severs communication between genitals and brain, thereby thwarting the very learning process that makes the development of sexual behavior possible.

Errol Morris, the filmmaker, was born with strabismus and subsequently lost almost all the vision in one eye, but feels he gets along perfectly well. I don't see the world as a plane. I tried to argue with him, to expatiate on the special character and beauty of stereopsis. However brilliantly a person with monocular vision may function, he or she is, in this one sense, totally lacking. With prismatic spectacles and exercises, Sue Barry recovered stereo vision after a lifetime of using her two eyes separately:.

I went back to my car and happened to glance at the steering wheel. I closed one eye, then the other, then looked with both eyes again, and the steering wheel looked different.

I decided that the light from the setting sun was playing tricks on me and drove home. But the next day I got up, did the eye exercises. When I looked at-the rear-view mirror, it had popped out from the windshield. Her new vision was "absolutely delightful," Sue wrote. Immediately after circumcision, the nerves of the glans bombard the brain with the new sense impressions they are constantly receiving, which the brain interprets as pain. Newly circumcised men are advised to wear loose clothing - none if this is practicable.

This fades over time. One reason will be that the brain learns to disregard these signals, like any other constant sensation. They have been called "false alarms". The sensitivity they have left, from their glanses, and which intact men do not experience as pleasure, is closely allied to pain. The quality of sensation from the foreskin is quite different, more like tickling. This would also suggest that circumcised men have a more hair-trigger kind of sensitivity. Having fewer nerves available to stimulate the centres that lead to ejaculation and orgasm, the nerves they have must work harder.

Thus it could well be true that "the circumcised male has more difficulty with ejaculatory control. Circumcision changes not only the amount but the kind of sensitivity of the glans, as well as removing all the sensitivity of the foreskin, except the anomalous stimulation from cut-off nerves that have formed the growths known as neuromas.

I have dealt, time and again, with talk show hosts who say "If I had any more sensitivity, I couldn't stand it. Many men think their inability to control orgasmic timing is due to over-sensitivity rather than the fact the lack tens of thousands of important nerve endings that provide essential feedback. In fact, men who talk like those hosts implicitly condemn circumcision for making their sensitivity too hair-trigger.

This growing collection of anecdotes is on another page. This also suggests a mechanism for what has often been noted informally and complained of by women , that circumcised men are more goal-oriented about sex. Getting to orgasm is more important than any pleasures to be had on the way. Circumcised men commonly say that there is nothing wrong with their sexuality because " I can still reach ejaculation and orgasm ".

When the ridged band is missing, the nervous connection between stimulation and arousal is so thin the "bandwidth" is so low, if you like , that the level of stimulation has to be high and uninterrupted to reach orgasm at all. Thus circumcised men can only relax and enjoy sex when orgasm has been reached, and orgasm is something that has to be achieved, it may not be pleasurably delayed.

Eichenlaub, nowhere mentions the foreskin, but recommends that a woman apply ice to her partner's perineum for a special thrill. Circumcised men commonly find their frenulum that is, whatever remnant of their ridged band was left on them to be the most sensitive part of their penis.

Many sex manuals assume this is true for all men. None has questioned why sexual sensitivity should be so concentrated. It was extracted from a much larger study that was not designed to study circumcision. It relied on self-reporting to determine circumcision status. Self-reporting has been shown to be remarkably inaccurate in other studies.

In statements that have been much more widely broadcast than the original study , Edward Laumann himself misquoted his own study:. The reference to the white population is usually left out. The reference to anal sex is false. This CNN report later says. They also were more likely to have had homosexual oral sex and heterosexual anal intercourse.

That figure sounds suspiciously low. Notice that the actual differences are quite small, or in the case of homosexual oral sex, the actual prevalence is small. To draw any conclusions from these results, whether "circumcision makes men enjoy sex more" or "circumcised men desparately seek out more varied practices to make up for what they have lost", is beside the point when the data are so weak.

Such significance as there is can readily be explained by class-differences and more conservative attitudes towards sex in general of classes that are less likely to circumcise. The study found circumcised men over 44 are somewhat less likely to report certain kinds of sexual dysfunction, but not others, than intact men over 44 - but that kind of result doesn't make headlines. Some of those categories overlap: It needs some explaining why cutting part of the penis off could make it easier to achieve or maintain an erection, but no explanation is forthcoming.

For the actual study, see http: Erectile function evaluation after adult circumcision. To evaluate the erectile function of adults after circumcision. Ninty-five patients were investigated on erectile function by questionnaire before and after circumcision, respectively. Adult circumcision has certain effect on erectile function, to which more importance should be attached. BJU International January OBJECTIVE To investigate the relationship between adult male circumcision and sexual satisfaction and function in men, as observational studies on the effect of adult male circumcision on sexual satisfaction show conflicting results.

We investigated self-reported sexual satisfaction and function among men enrolled in a randomized trial of male circumcision for human immunodeficiency virus HIV prevention conducted in Rakai, Uganda. In all, sexually experienced HIV-negative males aged 15—49 years were enrolled; were randomized to receive immediate circumcision intervention arm and to circumcision delayed for 24 months control arm.

Men were followed up at 6, 12 and 24 months, and information on sexual desire, satisfaction and erectile dysfunction was collected. These variables were compared between the study arms and over time within the study arms, using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests.

The trial registration number is NCT At 6 months, no difficulty with penetration was reported by There were no differences between the study arms in penetration or dyspareunia at later visits. Sexual satisfaction increased from Questions regarding sexual desire or satisfaction are, of necessity, subjective and refer to the individual's self-perception.

The questionnaire focused on difficulties with sexual function and did not ascertain more subjective aspects of sexual satisfaction such as changes in time to ejaculation, subjective intensity of orgasm or the partner's satisfaction with intercourse [19].

Also, circumcision status could not be completely concealed from the interviewers so there is a theoretical possibility that interviewer bias might affect participant response. Understanding how circumcision affects sexual pleasure is important in formulating public health messages to promote the acceptability of circumcision as an HIVprevention strategy. In KwaZulu Natal, South Africa, those men who thought that circumcised men enjoy sex more than uncircumcised men were seven times more willing to be circumcised , and men who thought that women enjoy sex more with circumcised men were over five times more willing to have the procedure [15].

Thus, our findings that circumcision had no adverse effects on sexual satisfaction or function are reassuring and provide important information for future programmes. Maybe we should all move to Uganda - it's a sexual paradise!

It seems their measures were too crude to measure anything. Remember, this is only a part of their study of circumcision and HIV, and they didn't want to find that circumcision harmed sexual satisfaction - as the word "reassuring" implies. Now watch these studies of adult volunteers in Uganda being used to "prove" that circumcising babies in the US is harmless! Epub Aug Male circumcision is being promoted for HIV prevention in high-risk heterosexual populations.

However, there is a concern that circumcision may impair sexual function. To assess adult male circumcision's effect on men's sexual function and pleasure. Exclusion criteria included foreskin covering less than half the glans, a condition that might unduly increase surgical risks, or a medical indication for circumcision. Participants were randomized 1: Detailed evaluations occurred at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months.

Between February and September , 2, participants [ men who had all volunteered to be circumcised in the hope it would protect them from HIV ] were randomized, including the excluded from this analysis because they crossed over, were not circumcised within 30 days of randomization, did not complete baseline interviews, or were outside the age range.

For the circumcision and control groups, respectively, rates of any reported sexual dysfunction decreased from Compared to before they were circumcised, Adult male circumcision was not associated with sexual dysfunction. Circumcised men reported increased penile sensitivity [ What ever became of " If I was any more sensitive J Urol, suppl, Morten Frisch writes in passing in his rebuttal to the responses of Morris, Waskett and Gray to his studies showing circumcision impairs sexuality:.

The questionnaires used to assess potential sexual problems in the two cited randomized controlled trials in Kenya and Uganda were not presented in detail in the original publications. Having obtained the questionnaires from the authors RH Gray and RC Bailey, personal communication , I am not surprised that these studies provided little evidence of a link between circumcision and various sexual difficulties.

Thus, non-differential misclassification of sexual outcomes in these African trials probably favoured the null hypothesis of no difference, whether an association was truly present or not. Acta Neurologica Belgica Circumcision is generally considered a simple, rapid operation with medical benefits which accrue throughout life.

In this study, the assessment of the pudendal evoked potentials PEP in adults before and at least 12 weeks after circumcision vas done. Healthy males aged between years, who were willing to undergo circumcision were included in the study, Before and after circumcision, sexual performance was evaluated with the Brief Male Sexual Function Inventory BMSFI , consisting of sexual drive, erection, ejaculation, problem assessment, and overall satisfaction sections.

Forty-three adult males were enrolled in the study. Mean PEP latency was Mean difference between pre- and postoperative PEP values was 2. A long PEP - the time for signals to go from the genitals to the brain - is a symptom of erectile dysfunction. In the light of our findings, we conclude that circumcision may contribute to sexual satisfaction by prolonging PEP latency but further studies are warranted also regarding the other dimensions of circumcision.

These doctors asked the men some questions about their sexual satisfaction but don't mention the answers presumably non-significant, because they asked the wrong questions and jump to the conclusion that circumcision is a Good Thing because of an electrical measurement of the nerves! In Turkey, men aged over 18 who had not been circumcised and were willing to be, or needed to be, would be a very skewed sample of the population.

This is truly junk science. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. To evaluate the effect of circumcision on the glans penis sensitivity by comparing the changes of the glans penis vibrotactile threshold between normal men and patients with simple redundant prepuce and among the patients before and after the operation.

The vibrotactile thresholds were measured at the forefinger and glans penis in 73 normal volunteer controls and 96 patients with simple redundant prepuce before and after circumcision by biological vibration measurement instrument, and the changes in the perception sensitivity of the body surface were analyzed. And those of the test group were 1. There is a statistic [significant?

The glans penis perception sensitivity decreases after circumcision. ABSTRACT We aimed to evaluate possible associations of circumcision with several sexual dysfunctions and to identify predictors for the development of these outcomes post-operatively. McNemar test was used for a matched-pairs analysis of pre- and post-operative data. Odds ratios, adjusted in a multivariate analysis, explored predictors of de novo sexual dysfunctions after circumcision.

With intervention [ circumcision ] , there was an increase in frequency of erectile dysfunction 9. Significant predictors for de novo erectile dysfunction were diabetes mellitus OR 9. Less than three sex partners OR 7. I studied in North America at University, once arriving at the University and living in halls, with the English accent and dry humour, I did pretty well with the lady's.

However, once the word went round, like wild fire, that I was 'uncut', I have never had so much action in my life, I had girls coming up to me in bars, in the cafeteria, and they couldn't stop examining it! I didn't complain the 1 year exchange was the happiest time of my life! The O'Hara study - like these pages - is written from the point of view that intactness is normal, which may look like an anti-circumcision bias in the prevailing pro-circumcision climate.

Some activists have objected to male circumcision because of the lack of data on female sexual satisfactions and sociologists have urged that circumcision roll out programs consider social factors that may affect women, including female sexual satisfaction. There has also been speculation that removal of the foreskin reduces female sexual satisfaction because the gliding action of the foreskin is thought to facilitate vaginal penetration.

We assessed the effect of adult medical male circumcision on postoperative female sexual satisfaction. We investigated self-reported sexual satisfaction among women partners of men circumcised in a randomized trial of male circumcision for HIV prevention in Rakai, Uganda. Women aged were interviewed about their sexual satisfaction before and after their partners were circumcised. We analyzed female reported changes in sexual satisfaction using Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests.

There was no statistically significant difference in reported change in sexual satisfaction before and after partner's circumcision by age, religion and education status. The overwhelming majority of women These findings suggest that male circumcision has no deleterious effect on female sexual satisfaction. Putting the opposite spin on it, the majority of women, It is clear from the wording what outcome the researchers wanted.

There could be no blinding of the results or placebo control. This raises the question, in each group, how good was it before, and how good after. What if the The impact of male circumcision status on sexual partners Jennifer A. A total of individuals women, 28 men currently in a sexual relationship with a man were recruited for an online survey. Sexual functioning for female or male participants assessed by the FSFI or IIEF-MSM, respectively was not impacted by circumcision status, but women with intact partners reported higher levels of sexual satisfaction , while no differences were observed in the male sample.

Women indicated a slight preference for circumcised penises for vaginal intercourse and fellatio, and held more positive beliefs about circumcised penises, while men indicated a strong preference toward intact penises for all sexual activities assessed and held more positive beliefs about intact penises. The current study demonstrates distinct gender differences in attitudes toward circumcision status but minimal impact of circumcision status on sexual functioning.

Future research should further explore sexual correlates of circumcision status, with a focus on directionality of said correlates and the impact on couples, as well as replicating the findings with a larger sample, specifically with respect to the male sample.

Eligible participants met the following criteria: Participants were excluded based on the following criteria: A total of individuals who met eligibility criteria completed the study in full, women and 28 men. Imagine for a moment a study of female cutting the asked only the cut women's partners about their experiences.

Women with intact partners reported significantly higher levels of sexual satisfaction than women with circumcised partners. It is possible that the presence of foreskin provides some benefits to sexual satisfaction outside of the domains assessed by the FSFI. The underlying fact is that women prefer what they are familiar with. But regardless of what a woman prefers, this should not be a consideration for circumcising a baby boy because.

Who can compare them? It is impossible for any man to both have been circumcised in infancy and left intact; any studies must compare different men. Two groups of men have some experience of both having and not having a foreskin, though:. I was serving a tool and die apprenticeship in a machine shop with several men that had served in the military during WWII.

They shared their experiences with having been circumcised as adults. They were both circumcised when they found themselves in military hospitals during the war.

One thought of it as a really good thing before it was done, It would be a status symbol because both men came from a small coal mining town, and only the wealthy were born in hospitals, and even then, only some of them were circumcised , but he felt very much differently about it afterwards. The second man would not have wanted it done, but he was too sick to give his view on it before the operation. You have to realize that this was only their opinions, and not the result of some measurement.

Still, I find the similarities in numbers very interesting. The man that would have objected tossed in one other insight. He mentioned that masturbation was almost a complete loss. He commented that you could still do it of course, but that it had been stripped of its main pleasures. He said you could do it "to scratch an itch", but it was mostly work until he would orgasm, which he said was pretty much the same as before.

The other thing that he mentioned was that now he needed either a pinup picture, or a "girly" magazine to get it to work, where he never had to use any props before. As mentioned above, the effects on the nervous system of adult circumcision are different from those of infant circumcision. The circumcised boy also experiences the whole development of his sexuality with a circumcised penis - he learns to use what he's got. A man circumcised in adulthood has to relearn, and may be unable to do so.

You do lose an enormous amount of sensitivity. It has no effect on ejaculation, or whether you can get an erection or not. Because you lose so much sensation you have to work much harder to get the same sensation which affects sex completely. Performance artist Peet Pienaar, who filmed and exhibited his own circumcision in His view is interesting because his reason for getting circumcised is neither medical nor sexual and if it was covertly sexual, he presumably expected an improvement.

These men responded within a few hours of a contrary article being published: J Urol May; 5: Evidence concerning the effect of circumcision on sexual function is lacking. Men circumcised as adults are potentially in a unique position to comment on the effect of a prepuce on sexual intercourse. We examine sexual function outcomes in men who have experienced sexual intercourse in the uncircumcised and circumcised states. Men 18 years old or older when circumcised were identified by billing records during a 5-year period at an academic medical center.

Medical charts were reviewed for confirmation of the procedure and to identify the indication s. These men were surveyed to assess erectile function, penile sensitivity, sexual activity and overall satisfaction. Data were analyzed using paired t tests to compare category scores before and after circumcision.

A total of men were circumcised as adults. Mean age of responders was 42 years at circumcision and 46 years at survey. Our findings may help urologists better counsel men undergoing circumcision as adults. What these findings should do is encourage urologists to seek alternatives to circumcision. The aim of the study was to compare sexual life and enjoyment of men and their partner that were circumcised as adults before and after their circumcision. The study included sexually active men that were circumcised two years before or more.

If it was for a sex-related problem, an improvement is to be expected. All the men filled a questionnaire about the quality of their sexual life and the sexual enjoyment before and after circumcision. Also, there were questions about partner's sexual life improvement. The results are presented below.

There were no significant differences in erection and ejaculation. The results support the view that physicians and parents should be informed of the potential benefits and risks before newborns are circumcised.

A Preliminary Cross-Sectional Study. Premature ejaculation PE is common. However, it has been underreported and undertreated. To determine the prevalence of PE and to investigate possible associated factors of PE.

Lady Sonia strokes, teases, and sucks a huge, black cock. The Masturbatrix strokes a cock with her fur mittens and gives it a good tease. Lesbian Mistress dominant females force sexual gratification from their girlfriends LadyBitch. Training and members pages Lady Sonia images and thousands of original custom made femdom content Lady Enigma the stage of the bdsm theatre, improvising paradoxal and unique scenes Lady Siville authentic fetish-mistress, as life style, of international fame Lady-Chasity.

Executive Mistress delivers a severe caning. Scene - severe caning with stripes! Beautfiful and buxom brunette Mistress disciplines two slaves.

Scene - caning and whipping More spanking from Miss Chloe! Over her knee with slipper and hand. Beautiful blonde Domme beats the shit out of her fat, male slave.

Video samples of whipping and ball kicking from the Russian Mistress. Over the knee caning from a harsh, young Domina. NEW A slave is strung up, then whipped and flogged. NEW An auburn haired Domme whips and straps her suspended slave. Spanking gallery from Miss Chloe. Cane, strap, and slipper! Mistress paddles her slave after her shower.

Scene - spanking, paddling A young lady straps her slave in the dungeon. Scene - strapping, whipping. Save yourself by serving me MistressLisa. New galleries and movies from FemDom Time. A hot brunette does anal play with her slave boy.

A double Domme attack! Mistress Sarah in a strapon and facesitting gallery. Deep anal exploration of a slave. Slave sucks and fucks a strapon attached to his goddesses. Lots of free pics MoonlightErotica. New movies from the Strapon Queen, Lisa Berlin. HUGE dildo fucking and sucking at the hands of his Mistress. Scene - dildo training - 3 movies and 10 pics NEW videos - And outdoor ass-fuckathon with two beautiful Dommes. Mistress Stella has her feet worshipped then uses her strapon.

Mistress Stella continues with her ass pounding, cock jerking, and fisting! NEW 15 strapon pics and 2 movies. Asian Domina fucks her boytoy. NEW 6 movies of a deep, strapon ass fucking for this male submissive. NEW 3 movies and 10 pics of a dildo being shoved in a bound slave's asshole. NEW Brunette Mistress prepares her slave for a mouth fucking with her strapon. Deep strapon fucking movies from a Domme in red PVC. Free trampling and facesitting pics.

Saudi Mistress Femdom toilet slavery, foot worship, cbt, humiliation video Original and unique pics, image sets and video clips. Gallery and video from Madame Ingrid - Ashtray service and a male whore. New thumbnail Gallery from FemDomTown featuring spitting and ashtray service Hot blonde smokes and spits in her black slave's face.

New gallery from Mistress Jennifer and friends. Mistress Isobel - smoking and bisex slave action. Heel worship and ashtray usage at the feet of a Russian Goddess. Sublime Domina Lady Asmondena uses her slave as an ashtray. NEW Brunette Mistress uses her human ashtray. Serving as an ashtray to a stunning Mistress. Footworship POV and smoking from a sensous blonde Domme. A smoking Domina and a collared footlicker. Cuckold Movies - Slave-Hubby submits and serves while his dominant wife cums Cuckold Creampie - sample video gallery.

Cuckold gallery including smothering, chastity and ass worship. Cuckolding and ass worship gallery from several beautiful ladies. NEW Cuckold Movie samples. NEW A cuckold lifestyle with a black bull and a cross-dressed hubby. Cuckold creampie movies - Mistress Lia in 6 cuckolding movie samples. Cuckold gallery - Submissive husbands watch their wives fuck their well-hung lovers. Cuckold galleries - more from the series. Sissy husbands enjoy their wives and lovers.

Lexy in 6" heels and stockings. She strips down and lets you get close. Great POV shots of this blonde in striped stockings and lingerie. Pantyhose gallery - Captive cocks! Cute, young Mistress Sarah in 6 video samples featuring pantyhose smothering and ass fucking! Mistress Karin Von Kroft in stockings, heels and lingerie. The unbelievable Mistress Samantha in a new pantyhose tease gallery! Teasing and cock pumping. NEW Mistress Karin posing in tan stockings.

Gallery from Mistress Karin Von Kroft. POV shots of a beautiful brunette in pantyhose and heels. Up close and personal!

Watch Sucking and Fucking a Fun Young Fan on ricksteineralaska.com, the best hardcore porn site. Pornhub is home to the widest selection of free Blonde sex videos full of the hottest pornstars. If you're craving mom XXX movies you'll find them here. NEW Foot Cleaning Caffe - A place where tongue meets tired young girls feet. Real 24/7 Slave Service - BalkanBratDomination NEW Petticoat Punishment courtesy of Madame Ingrid. Free photos and a video. Sample galleries from Amber's Dungeon. Bi-sexual male slaves and strapon sucking pictures. Read the latest breaking news around Toronto as well as national and international news including images, videos, and community discussion.